A Philosophy of Evidence Law

Released on by H. L. Ho
preview-18

  • A Philosophy of Evidence Law Book Detail

  • Author : H. L. Ho
  • Release Date : 2008-03-06
  • Publisher : Oxford University Press, USA
  • Genre : Law
  • Pages : 362
  • ISBN 13 : 0199228302
  • File Size : 57,57 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

A Philosophy of Evidence Law by H. L. Ho PDF Summary

Book Description: This book examines the legal and moral theory behind the law of evidence and proof, arguing that only by exploring the nature of responsibility in fact-finding can the role and purpose of much of the law be fully understood. Ho argues that the court must not only find the truth to do justice, it must do justice in finding the truth.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own A Philosophy of Evidence Law books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

A Philosophy of Evidence Law

A Philosophy of Evidence Law

File Size : 52,52 MB
Total View : 7735 Views
DOWNLOAD

This book examines the legal and moral theory behind the law of evidence and proof, arguing that only by exploring the nature of responsibility in fact-finding

Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law

Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law

File Size : 37,37 MB
Total View : 5444 Views
DOWNLOAD

Philosophy has a strong presence in evidence law and the nature of evidence is a highly debated topic in both general and social epistemology; legal theorists w

The Proof

The Proof

File Size : 88,88 MB
Total View : 6685 Views
DOWNLOAD

Winner of the Scribes Book Award “Displays a level of intellectual honesty one rarely encounters these days...This is delightful stuff.” —Barton Swaim, Wa

A Philosophy of Evidence Law

A Philosophy of Evidence Law

File Size : 96,96 MB
Total View : 6434 Views
DOWNLOAD

This book examines the legal and moral theory behind the law of evidence and proof, arguing that only by exploring the nature of responsibility in fact-finding