Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment

Released on by John Pittard
preview-18

  • Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment Book Detail

  • Author : John Pittard
  • Release Date : 2020
  • Publisher : Oxford University Press, USA
  • Genre : Philosophy
  • Pages : 361
  • ISBN 13 : 0190051817
  • File Size : 88,88 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment by John Pittard PDF Summary

Book Description: Every known religious or explicitly irreligious outlook is contested by large contingents of informed and reasonable people. Many philosophers have argued that reflection on this fact should lead us to abandon confident religious or irreligious belief and to embrace religious skepticism. John Pittard critically assesses the case for such disagreement-motivated religious skepticism. While the book focuses on religious disagreement, it makes a number of significant contributions to the more general discussion of the rational significance of disagreement as well.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Religious Disagreement

Religious Disagreement

File Size : 87,87 MB
Total View : 9244 Views
DOWNLOAD

This Element examines what we can learn from religious disagreement, focusing on disagreement with possible selves and former selves, the epistemic significance

Religious Disagreement and Pluralism

Religious Disagreement and Pluralism

File Size : 69,69 MB
Total View : 7149 Views
DOWNLOAD

Epistemological questions about the significance of disagreement have advanced alongside broader developments in social epistemology concerning testimony, the n

Epistemic Authority

Epistemic Authority

File Size : 86,86 MB
Total View : 9312 Views
DOWNLOAD

Gives an extended argument for epistemic authority from the implications of reflective self-consciousness. Epistemic authority is compatible with autonomy, but