Imagination and Interpretation in Kant

preview-18
  • Imagination and Interpretation in Kant Book Detail

  • Author : Rudolf A. Makkreel
  • Release Date : 1990
  • Publisher : University of Chicago Press
  • Genre : Philosophy
  • Pages : 201
  • ISBN 13 : 0226502775
  • File Size : 38,38 MB

Imagination and Interpretation in Kant by Rudolf A. Makkreel PDF Summary

Book Description: In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the purposiveness of history.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Imagination and Interpretation in Kant books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Imagination and Interpretation in Kant

Imagination and Interpretation in Kant

File Size : 32,32 MB
Total View : 5751 Views
DOWNLOAD

In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant'

Imagination and Interpretation in Kant

Imagination and Interpretation in Kant

File Size : 50,50 MB
Total View : 5843 Views
DOWNLOAD

In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant'

Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant

Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant

File Size : 86,86 MB
Total View : 2148 Views
DOWNLOAD

Is there any justification for Heidegger's famous 'violence' against Kant's philosophy? An independent assessment of the worth of Heidegger's argument is also m