The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model

Released on by Terry Barker
preview-18

  • The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model Book Detail

  • Author : Terry Barker
  • Release Date : 1987
  • Publisher : Cambridge University Press
  • Genre : Business & Economics
  • Pages : 540
  • ISBN 13 : 9780521330046
  • File Size : 46,46 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model by Terry Barker PDF Summary

Book Description: This 1998 book presents the econometric analysis of single-equation and simultaneous-equation models in which the jointly dependent variables can be continuous, categorical, or truncated. Despite the traditional emphasis on continuous variables in econometrics, many of the economic variables encountered in practice are categorical (those for which a suitable category can be found but where no actual measurement exists) or truncated (those that can be observed only in certain range). Such variables are involved, for example, in models of occupational choice, choice of tenture in housing, and choice of type of schooling. Models with regulated prices and rationing and models for program evaluation also represent areas of application for the techniques presented by the author.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model

The Cambridge Multisectoral Dynamic Model

File Size : 92,92 MB
Total View : 2999 Views
DOWNLOAD

This 1998 book presents the econometric analysis of single-equation and simultaneous-equation models in which the jointly dependent variables can be continuous,

Regional Science in Business

Regional Science in Business

File Size : 97,97 MB
Total View : 1607 Views
DOWNLOAD

Graham Clarke and Moss Madden 1. 1 Background In the mid 1990s there were a number of papers in regional science that questioned the relevance and purpose of th