The Limits of Judicial Power

Released on by William Lasser
preview-18

  • The Limits of Judicial Power Book Detail

  • Author : William Lasser
  • Release Date : 2017-10-01
  • Publisher : UNC Press Books
  • Genre : Political Science
  • Pages : 467
  • ISBN 13 : 1469632462
  • File Size : 3,3 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

The Limits of Judicial Power by William Lasser PDF Summary

Book Description: Lasser examines in detail four periods during which the Court was widely charged with overstepping its constitutional power: the late 1850s, with the Dred Scott case and its aftermath; the Reconstruction era; the New Deal era; and the years of the Warren and Burger Courts after 1954. His thorough analysis of the most controversial decisions convincingly demonstrates that the Court has much more power to withstand political reprisal than is commonly assumed. Originally published in 1988. A UNC Press Enduring Edition -- UNC Press Enduring Editions use the latest in digital technology to make available again books from our distinguished backlist that were previously out of print. These editions are published unaltered from the original, and are presented in affordable paperback formats, bringing readers both historical and cultural value.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own The Limits of Judicial Power books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

The Limits of Judicial Power

The Limits of Judicial Power

File Size : 97,97 MB
Total View : 4741 Views
DOWNLOAD

Lasser examines in detail four periods during which the Court was widely charged with overstepping its constitutional power: the late 1850s, with the Dred Scott

The Supreme Court in American Politics

The Supreme Court in American Politics

File Size : 63,63 MB
Total View : 9055 Views
DOWNLOAD

For decades political scientists studying the Court have adopted behavioral approaches and focused on the relatively narrow question of how the justices' policy