Biennial Budgeting

Released on by Susan J. Irving
preview-18

  • Biennial Budgeting Book Detail

  • Author : Susan J. Irving
  • Release Date : 2000-10
  • Publisher : DIANE Publishing
  • Genre : Business & Economics
  • Pages : 48
  • ISBN 13 : 9780756718404
  • File Size : 86,86 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

Biennial Budgeting by Susan J. Irving PDF Summary

Book Description: Congress has periodically expressed interest in converting the Fed. budget process from an annual to a biennial cycle (BC). However, proposals to move to a BC raise a number of concerns. Both opponents and proponents of a BC have used states' experiences to support their positions. Currently, 23 states have all or part of their budget on a BC. This report studies the BC process of Arizona, Connecticut, and Ohio in detail. It examines how: (1) Arizona and Connecticut implemented their transition from an annual to a BC; (2) each of the 3 states budgets in the off year of its cycle, and (3) each of the states incorporates legislative oversight and program evaluation into its BC. Charts and tables.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Biennial Budgeting books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Biennial Budgeting

Biennial Budgeting

File Size : 34,34 MB
Total View : 3853 Views
DOWNLOAD

Congress has periodically expressed interest in converting the Fed. budget process from an annual to a biennial cycle (BC). However, proposals to move to a BC r

Biennial Budgeting

Biennial Budgeting

File Size : 12,12 MB
Total View : 5685 Views
DOWNLOAD

Biennial budgeting is a concept that may involve several variations, including two-year budget resolutions, two-year appropriations, and other changes in the ti

Biennial Budgeting

Biennial Budgeting

File Size : 24,24 MB
Total View : 5866 Views
DOWNLOAD

Proponents of biennial budgeting have generally advanced three arguments-that a two-year budget cycle would (1) reduce congressional workload by eliminating the