Theology, Politics, and Exegesis

Released on by Jeffrey L. Morrow
preview-18

  • Theology, Politics, and Exegesis Book Detail

  • Author : Jeffrey L. Morrow
  • Release Date : 2017-11-07
  • Publisher : Wipf and Stock Publishers
  • Genre : Religion
  • Pages : 138
  • ISBN 13 : 1532614934
  • File Size : 24,24 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

Theology, Politics, and Exegesis by Jeffrey L. Morrow PDF Summary

Book Description: Modern biblical scholars often view the methods they employ as objective and neutral, tracing the history of modern biblical scholarship to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In this volume, Jeffrey Morrow examines some earlier, lesser known roots of modern biblical scholarship. He explores biblical scholarship from the fourteenth through the seventeenth centuries and then discusses its new place in the Enlightenment of the eighteenth century where such scholarship would flourish. Far from merely an objective and neutral method, such scholarship was never without philosophical, theological, and political underpinnings. Morrow concludes the volume with a look at the separation of biblical studies from theology, using the example of Catholic moral theology in the twentieth century.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Theology, Politics, and Exegesis books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Theology, Politics, and Exegesis

Theology, Politics, and Exegesis

File Size : 76,76 MB
Total View : 3260 Views
DOWNLOAD

Modern biblical scholars often view the methods they employ as objective and neutral, tracing the history of modern biblical scholarship to the eighteenth and n

Pretensions of Objectivity

Pretensions of Objectivity

File Size : 7,7 MB
Total View : 7036 Views
DOWNLOAD

Modern historical biblical criticism, while having many strengths, often operates under the pretensions of objectivity, as if such scholarship were neutral and