Judgments of Responsibility

Released on by Bernard Weiner
preview-18

  • Judgments of Responsibility Book Detail

  • Author : Bernard Weiner
  • Release Date : 1995-04-14
  • Publisher : Guilford Press
  • Genre : Psychology
  • Pages : 326
  • ISBN 13 : 9780898628432
  • File Size : 20,20 MB
DOWNLOAD BOOK

Judgments of Responsibility by Bernard Weiner PDF Summary

Book Description: Presenting a general theory of social motivation, this compelling work integrates research on achievement evaluation, stigmatization, helping behavior, aggression, and impression management. Bernard Weiner examines how responsibility inferences are reached, the manner in which such judgments affect emotions, and the role that "cold" judgments of responsibility versus "hot" feelings, such as anger, play in producing both pro- and antisocial behaviors. Ideal for students as well as researchers and mental health practitioners, the book includes experiments for the reader to complete that illustrate the main points of the text.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Judgments of Responsibility books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Judgments of Responsibility

Judgments of Responsibility

File Size : 56,56 MB
Total View : 1613 Views
DOWNLOAD

Presenting a general theory of social motivation, this compelling work integrates research on achievement evaluation, stigmatization, helping behavior, aggressi

Responsibility and Judgment

Responsibility and Judgment

File Size : 85,85 MB
Total View : 3117 Views
DOWNLOAD

Each of the books that Hannah Arendt published in her lifetime was unique, and to this day each continues to provoke fresh thought and interpretations. This was

The Attribution of Blame

The Attribution of Blame

File Size : 81,81 MB
Total View : 9405 Views
DOWNLOAD

How can we identify the causes of events? What does it mean to assert that someone is responsible for a moral affront? Under what circumstances should we blame