Justice Rehnquist, the Supreme Court, and the Bill of Rights

preview-18
  • Justice Rehnquist, the Supreme Court, and the Bill of Rights Book Detail

  • Author : Steven T. Seitz
  • Release Date : 2020-07-02
  • Publisher : Rowman & Littlefield
  • Genre : Law
  • Pages : 295
  • ISBN 13 : 1498568866
  • File Size : 24,24 MB

Justice Rehnquist, the Supreme Court, and the Bill of Rights by Steven T. Seitz PDF Summary

Book Description: The Bill of Rights and Civil War Amendments created a triangular power struggle among state, nation and individual. Using chronological court cases, this book examines how the Supreme Court became arbiter among the three claimants to power, sometimes backtracking and sometimes taking a bold leap forward. Focusing on Justice Rehnquist’s lengthy term on the Supreme Court, Steven T. Seitz examines the growth and emphasis of individual sovereignty throughout the twentieth century. Highlighting some of the dispositional problems with Rehnquist decisions, the book uses the sustainable case law standard instead of applauding either conservative or liberal point of view which provides new vantage points on topics like equal protection of women, due process in several arenas, contracts, free speech, sex, and guns.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Justice Rehnquist, the Supreme Court, and the Bill of Rights books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

The Partisan

The Partisan

File Size : 81,81 MB
Total View : 1366 Views
DOWNLOAD

Follows Rehnquist's career as a young lawyer in Arizona through his journey to Washington though the Warren and Burger courts to his twenty-year tenure as a Sup

The Most Activist Supreme Court in History

The Most Activist Supreme Court in History

File Size : 20,20 MB
Total View : 6340 Views
DOWNLOAD

When conservatives took control of the federal judiciary in the 1980s, it was widely assumed that they would reverse the landmark rights-protecting precedents s