Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004

preview-18
  • Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004 Book Detail

  • Author : William Saletan
  • Release Date : 2003
  • Publisher : Plume Books
  • Genre : Presidential candidates
  • Pages : 0
  • ISBN 13 : 9780452284999
  • File Size : 19,19 MB

Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004 by William Saletan PDF Summary

Book Description: Which 2004 presidential candidate was found liable for defamation? Which one dumped someone else's combat medals at an antiwar protest? Which two voted to ban abortion? Which four are divorced? If traditional coverage of the 2004 presidential election is leaving you with more questions that answers, turn off your TV and pick up Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates. From the candidates' views on key issues such as foreign policy, gun control, and abortion, to their worst flip-flops and favorite buzzwords, to their pet issues and personal quirks, Slate's Field Guide to the Candidatesdelves deep to answer the questions readers didn't even know they had. This is the source for every American who hopes to be truly informed about the 2004 presidential election.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004 books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004

Slate's Field Guide to the Candidates 2004

File Size : 15,15 MB
Total View : 3262 Views
DOWNLOAD

Which 2004 presidential candidate was found liable for defamation? Which one dumped someone else's combat medals at an antiwar protest? Which two voted to ban a

Democratic Orators from JFK to Barack Obama

Democratic Orators from JFK to Barack Obama

File Size : 16,16 MB
Total View : 3068 Views
DOWNLOAD

How do leading Democratic Party figures strive to communicate with and influence their audience? Why have some proven more successful than others in advancing t