The Aftermath of Syllogism

preview-18
  • The Aftermath of Syllogism Book Detail

  • Author : Marco Sgarbi
  • Release Date : 2018-01-25
  • Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing
  • Genre : Philosophy
  • Pages : 233
  • ISBN 13 : 1350043532
  • File Size : 72,72 MB

The Aftermath of Syllogism by Marco Sgarbi PDF Summary

Book Description: Syllogism is a form of logical argument allowing one to deduce a consistent conclusion based on a pair of premises having a common term. Although Aristotle was the first to conceive and develop this way of reasoning, he left open a lot of conceptual space for further modifications, improvements and systematizations with regards to his original syllogistic theory. From its creation until modern times, syllogism has remained a powerful and compelling device of deduction and argument, used by a variety of figures and assuming a variety of forms throughout history. The Aftermath of Syllogism investigates the key developments in the history of this peculiar pattern of inference, from Avicenna to Hegel. Taking as its focus the longue durée of development between the Middle Ages and the nineteenth century, this book looks at the huge reworking scientific syllogism underwent over the centuries, as some of the finest philosophical minds brought it to an unprecedented height of logical sharpness and sophistication. Bringing together a group of major international experts in the Aristotelian tradition, The Aftermath of Syllogism provides a detailed, up to date and critical evaluation of the history of syllogistic deduction.

Disclaimer: www.yourbookbest.com does not own The Aftermath of Syllogism books pdf, neither created or scanned. We just provide the link that is already available on the internet, public domain and in Google Drive. If any way it violates the law or has any issues, then kindly mail us via contact us page to request the removal of the link.

The Aftermath of Syllogism

The Aftermath of Syllogism

File Size : 72,72 MB
Total View : 364 Views
DOWNLOAD

Syllogism is a form of logical argument allowing one to deduce a consistent conclusion based on a pair of premises having a common term. Although Aristotle was